Michael has finally got off his butt to pull together the second (and final) episode from the Show Floor at Essen 2014! Truly, it is the finest way to celebrate Christmas. Gather your family around the hearth, plug your iPhone into its dock and listen to the wonderful events from the biggest games show in the world. Happy holidays, y’all!
Emma: When I was asked to do a review of Asmodée’s new release of Hotel Tycoon, I’ll admit I was slightly shocked. Not because it’s a bad game (it isn’t) and not because I don’t have opinions on it (I do, and besides, I’ll develop strong opinions on anything given half the chance), but because it’s not exactly a new game. It’s a new version of Hotel (or possibly Hotels, depending on the version), which I remember playing as a teenager. And so does my mother. Further digging revealed that Hotel Tycoon is probably more deserving of some kind of celebrity-interview-studded career retrospective than a new review, since the original game came out in 1974.
In any case, it swiftly became clear that the only way to review Hotel Tycoon would be to ignore the last 40 years, and treat it like a game that just came out. Which, fortunately for our suspension of disbelief, it did. Anyway, my inane meta ramblings aside, let’s get on to the actual game. But first, a warning. If you think board games today should be entirely about cubes and strategy and deadly serious, YOU WILL NOT LIKE THIS GAME. I have nothing against you, and I’ll come and lose to you at Caverna any time, but this is not a game for the super-hardcore Eurogaming crowd. Spicy variety and all that. So, for everyone else, here’s Hotel Tycoon, a game of erecting dazzlingly phallic monuments to your own financial skill and watching them get razed to the ground for a day’s wages by the people you thought you were your friends.
Now, as you might have gathered from the introduction, or indeed by playing any previous version of the game, Hotel Tycoon is very much a family game. You roll a die to move in one direction around the board, and the space you land on does things. That’s it, pretty much. And as you fly around the track in your deceptively enormous plastic planes, you will, unsurprisingly, build hotels, which you then charge your opponents to stay in. So far, so Monopoly (although Michael will probably lock me in the basement for saying that word on the site) [It’s OK, we have a three strikes policy. And a basement. – Michael] . But it’s not. For one thing, it’s a lot faster and tighter than the dreaded M-word, with games taking about 30-45 minutes, rather than entire days. This largely comes down to a few interesting twists in the rules, which I understand are new to this version (yay for being topical!) – rather than being sold back to the bank for their original value, the only way to make extra money when you really need it is to auction off your hotels to opponents, with no minimum price, and if nobody wants it, your hotel is demolished, leaving you with nothing. So, instead of property being the virtually no-risk investment it is in…other games, every purchase has to be weighed against the chance of running out of money before your new hotel makes you your money back – sure, you can buy a load of property, but if you have to pay someone else before people start paying you, you’re screwed. So points for realism. This is compounded by the delightfully vicious Planning Permission die, which you have to roll every time you want to build more hotels. One face denies you the chance to build that turn, one means you get your building for free, and one makes you pay double. Of course, you don’t roll it until after you’ve decided what you want to build, leading to some fantastically tense moments when one player goes for an upgrade that should take most of their money, only to roll the dreaded “2” and immediately go bankrupt. And yes, this does feature that other bugbear of ‘serious’ gamers, player elimination, but honestly? With games this quick, there’s rarely a long period where players are out of the game, and I think the unequivocal brutality of it meshes really well with the cutthroat property theme.
Anyway, there are any number of nice game features I could go into (entrances giving players control over the distribution of their hotels, the rules changing when only two players are left to remove all external income, the sheer brutality of a two-player game…) but I’ll get to the main reason most people are interested in Hotel Tycoon. The shinies. See, whereas games that rhyme with ‘Shmoshmopoly’ might just have you put a little red counter down when you build a hotel, in this game, you…well, you build a hotel. The game comes with something like forty different paper-and-card hotel buildings in a dozen different vaguely-stereotypical styles, and when you expand your hotels, you put more buildings on the board. This even expands to strangely-shaped card overlays that allow you to directly develop the land around your hotels and make the board look amazing. All in all, this gives Hotel Tycoon a sense of scale and development you’d be hard-pressed to find in other similar games, and definitely ranks it among the prettiest games I own, even if packing the buildings away is a bit of a nightmare (seriously, the game comes with a step-by-step instruction sheet to put them away). Sure, the components aren’t perfect – my Dragon Gate buildings have something of a tendency to fall apart, and I inexplicably have a second green plane instead of a red – but they’re probably the best you’re going to find in a game they’re selling in high-street shops.
So yeah. Hotel Tycoon. It’s got its flaws, and it’s not going to win Kennerspiel des Jahres any time soon, but if you’re looking for something the whole family can play, that doesn’t require too much thinking but brings a sense of victory and achievement, you’d traditionally only have one choice. And if you think that game would lead to your family slowly going insane and murdering each other over lunch money, maybe try out Hotel Tycoon instead. At least that way it’ll be quick.
Hotel Tycoon, originally Hotel, was designed by Denys Fisher and released back in 1974. Between two and four people can play, and you should be able to get hold of a copy of this brand new (and rather swish) version of the game for between £20-25. A bargain for such luxury!
The Judge likes his big, meaty games. Something he can spend hours pouring over, calculating probabilities in his mind, considering the options he has, the moves he can make. Then he takes the wrapping off and actually opens up the damn thing. Sometimes though, even he desires something smaller, though no less mentally delicious. Here’s the first of a two-parter from him on some little games that pack a punch. Or, in his case, a meathook clothesline.
“Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re going to get – unless you look at the useful cheat-sheet which meticulously details the nutritional information, ingredients and potential nut content of each delicious treat.”
Not as catchy as the original quote, perhaps, but certainly more accurate – which is appropriate for today I am going to look at a few smaller games that have crossed my table recently (a pick‘n’mix selection, shall we say) and give you lovely readers a breakdown of which are hazelnut pralines (yummy) and which are strawberry creams (icky!). [You, sir, are an idiot. Strawberry Creams are the best. – Michael]
You have to respect a game that proudly states that it plays up to 99 players in around fifteen minutes and isn’t even lying. Created by Hisashi Hiyashi of Trains fame, Rolling Japan game encapsulates the wave of micro-games that have come from the East in recent years insomuch as it brings a great deal of entertainment with relatively few components in a tiny little package.
Quick summary for those not in the know – a player rolls 2 dice and announces their number and colour to the assembled throng. Those players then take their pencil (8 are included – the other 91 need make their own arrangements) and write those numbers on their own personal playsheet that contains an approximation of Japan split into coloured boxes. The only restriction is that a red two, for instance, must be placed in a red box, and it may not be placed adjacent to any number that isn’t equal to it or one number away. So a three may only be placed next to threes, twos or fours. If you can’t go then add an X instead – after 8 rounds the least X’s wins.
So then, it’s really simple and easy at the start but maddeningly tricky by the end, and its good fun. A tricky little personal puzzle (this really is the definition of multiplayer solitaire) with more than enough think and decisions to entertain across its short running time.
Rolling Japan is a perfect start / end of night filler and with everyone playing simultaneously, it moves along at a good clip and can genuinely cope with very large player counts. Not revolutionary (though I wouldn’t be surprised to see it on next years’ recommended list for the Spiel des Jahres) but it fits a niche that guarantees a space in my collection.
The new HOTNESS coming out of BGG.com was a simple little card game with a good pedigree. That game is Red7.
Now this was described to me initially as Fluxx for gamers. Few words in the gamer vernacular strike fear into my heart quite as, erm, strikingly as Fluxx. The popular card game that could conceivably last for ever, and often feels like it does, is not a favourite of mine. That said, the core mechanism of rules constantly evolving over the course of a play is a truly interesting one and it is this gamespace that has been explored and refined in Red7.
As far as pedigree goes, any new card game from Carl Chudyk, the designer of Glory to Rome (a truly innovative civ building game) and Innovation (a tech tree in card game form which lots of people really like but I can’t stand) is worth exploring. With that in mind, and the buzz surrounding this new release, I was initially quite optimistic.
And rightly so! Mechanically straightforward (at least in its basic mode which is all I have and intend to play for the time being) this is a great game. Like Rolling Japan, it’s very quick – and feels more akin to a trick taking game than anything else, in so much as a hand is playable in just 5-10 minutes.
Players begin with a hand of 7 cards with a further card placed in their palette or display in front of them. The deck contains numbers 1-7 in the seven colours of the rainbow (Richard Of York Gave Battle In Vain, remember?) and each colour also has a rule associated to it – such as “Most different colours wins.” The game begins with the rule being “Highest number wins” so the player with the highest number in their display (with ties broken by the rainbow colour hierarchy) is winning. Play continues clockwise from them and on a turn players may add a card to their palette, play a card to change the rule, or both. The only restriction is that you MUST be winning at the end of your turn, or you’re out of the round.
Again this is mechanically simple, but with elements of long term strategy and deeper tactics. You are not drawing additional cards throughout the round, so you simply must survive as long as you can and make things difficult for the other players whilst making the best of the hand you have been dealt. Which, in many ways, is a metaphor for life… Take that Forrest Gump!
A few hands of Red7 are a great way to begin a gaming evening. Simple to teach and quick to play, I heartily recommend this game.
Follow Stuart on Twitter, and be sure to come back for part 2 where we have more sweet (and perhaps some sour) treats to explore…
Gather round, and let your Aunt Emma tell you all a story, a story of wow this is kind of creepy I’ll stop.
In any case, our story begins in the mists of May of last year, when I was spending a lot of time looking at board games on Kickstarter. At one point, I decided to drop some of my money on What’s He Building In There?, a competitive game of mad science and supervillainy, where each player controls a mad genius and his henchmen, trying to build the best doomsday device while also constructing an escape plan on the side (because nobody wants to be stuck in town when your IQ-Reducing Idiotifier goes off). However, you’ve only got a limited time before Scotland Yard turn up to ruin everything, so you’ve got 15 turns to efficiently use all the resources at your disposal to make your plans the best they can be. Over those 15 turns, you’ll be sending people to markets to buy your raw resources, turning your henchmen into raw manual labour, and sending your doctor to do all the heavy thinking, as well as advancing on the Social, Security, and Exotic Pets tracks, because nobody’s going to take your Evil Doctorate seriously if you don’t have a komodo dragon or two in your heavily-fortified lab complex. On another note, just writing that phrase has made me want to put D.Ev after my name, and I encourage all my readers to do the same.
Anyway, to get back to the story, the estimated delivery on the project was August 2013. Now, I was never really expecting it to arrive on time, because Kickstarters never do, but I started to get seriously concerned around November, when I started seeing the game in shops. At first, I thought it was just my game that hadn’t come, but looking at the project, it became clear that nobody’s had. As time wore on and Baksha Games were less than forthcoming with replies on why all this was happening, I pretty much lost all faith in the game actually turning up, or in it being any good. The latter thought was not helped by me picking up a copy of Baksha’s previous game, Good Help, to which WHBIT is billed as a sequel, and finding that it was…well, it’s not very good. At all. Finally, a couple of months ago my copy turned up, and I eventually broke through the mists of apathy and disappointment around it to try it out.
The first time I played WHBIT, my thoughts on it were basically AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAactuallythisisprettyfunAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA… You swiftly become aware that 15 turns is not very long at all to bring your plans to fruition, especially when you only have one doctor, and he’s the only one that can perform almost half the actions on the board, including producing the all-important Genius Labour, which you’ll need to build all your inventions. Efficient play is a very big part of this game, and that ties in nicely with the hectic, industrial feel of it all, even if it does feel like it’ll give you a migraine when you realise it’s round 7 and you haven’t got anything done. This stress is lessened somewhat with more players, as the game plays with 2 to 6, and the main balancing mechanic for this is that you only get as many resource markets available as there are players. Thus, when you’re only playing with two, you can end up waiting for several rounds for either of the resources available to be useful to you, but with more, it’s a lot more likely to get something you want. There’s another advantage to having more players, and that has to do with how the game manages inventions.
See, the invention system in WHBIT feels kind of like Craftsmen, in that you need raw materials to make refined materials, which you need to make Intermediate Inventions, which you will need (along with more raw and refined materials) to build your main objectives. Inventing any of the intermediate components requires Genius Labour, which you’re only going to get a finite amount of, but if somebody’s already invented the thing you want, you just pay them for the designs rather than making it yourself. In two-player games, you’re probably going to invent the majority of the things you need yourself, which ties up your doctor for most of the game producing Genius, but with more, it’s more likely that you can buy the designs you need off your rivals, and your henchmen can help generate money to do that with.
Another thing I like about WHBIT is its inclusion of something we don’t see in a lot of competitive games: a failure state. When you get dealt your Doomsday Device and Escape Plan at the start of the game, as well as noticing the cool way in which they interlock to form a privacy screen, you’ll see that each of them have three stages, each granting more points but requiring more materials, with stage 1 being relatively manageable and stage 3 infuriatingly impossible. Now, the corollary of this is the fact that, if you are unable to complete at least stage 1 of both your Doomsday Device and your Escape Plan, you cannot win the game. You can get as many points as you like for exotic pets and intermediate inventions, but you’ll never quite escape the shame of how you either blew yourself up with your own master plan or fled town with not even an apocalypse to show for it.
To be honest, shady Kickstarter practices aside, there really aren’t many things I don’t like about this game. Sure, the first-player marker is the same white cylinder as the turn marker, the victory point track is both tiny and extraneous, and the Direct-Effect Inventions (which give you interesting new abilities) seem weirdly underpowered, but to an extent, these all feel like quibbles. What’s He Building In There? is, at its heart, an exceptionally solid game, marrying hardcore Euro worker placement with interesting theme and enjoyable new mechanics, and I’d honestly recommend it to anyone at least once. Just watch out for the headaches. Also the tarantulas. And did I mention the death rays?
What’s He Building In There? was designed by Sean Garrity and released earlier this year by Baksha games. Copies are available of this terrifying brain-melter of a game (that’s a recommendation, by the way) from the good folks at Gameslore, where it’ll set you back a shade over £30. Oh, and follow Emma on Twitter where she’s @Waruce!
Hisashi Hayashi, you magnificent bastard.
Trains. Edo Yashiki. String Railway. Sail to India. Four great games, all designed by the same guy, Hisashi Hiyashi, that I’ve played plenty this past year or so, and will continue to do so for a good long time. Now I can add a fifth game into the rotation, Rolling Japan, that at first appearance seems to be the lightest of the bunch. In reality, this one might end up being the most brain-melting of the five, despite being little more than some paper maps and a bunch of dice.
Any number between one and eight can play, though that eight is only down to the fact that’s how many little pens are included in the box. In reality, Rolling Japan is a single player game at heart where each time you play, you’re looking to score as low as possible. Of course, that extrapolates to a larger game with more people where you’re ALL trying to do that, but yes – this is essentially solitaire dressed up as multiplayer. Not that it’s a bad thing in any way, not at all.
To play, everyone is given a small sheet with an abstract map of Japan on it, split into six different coloured zones, themselves segmented into sets of smaller boxes. Rather than go into ludicrously in-depth description, here’s a picture. Much easier.
Also included in the package is a bag of seven dice, six of which correspond to the colours of the areas on the map; so, white, black, green, yellow, red and blue. Played out over the course of eight rounds, three pairs of dice will be pulled from the bag and rolled; the numbers that appear must be written down in the boxes of the same colour on the map – so far, so simple. Oh, if the purple one comes out, it’s treated as a wild, so you get to put that number in any coloured area you like.
Once the six dice have been drawn, they’re thrown back in the bag. There’s a helpful Round Marker to strike off, then you move on to do the same thing again… but there are a couple of things to consider. First of all, no more than one number can be put in a single box. Second, if you’re looking to put a number in a box next to one that’s already been filled in, it has to be either the same or one above or below. And, immediately after realising quite how awful those restrictions are, you swiftly get quite how great this little puzzle is.
If you’re unable to place the rolled number(s) onto the map, you have to choose a spot to fill with an X – Rolling Japan‘s mark of shame. It’s these Xs that are tallied as your score at the end of the game – remember, the lower the amount, the better – but there are thankfully three lifelines in the form of Color Changes available to you. Instead of being forced to throw down an X, filling up a space and potentially screwing yourself over later in the game, you can take the number and drop it into another colour region. Sure, you still have to follow the rules of placement as detailed previously, but it’s way better than having to scribble down a dreaded and terrible X…
Pretty soon, things start getting very busy on your map. At around the halfway mark you’ll realise that you’ve probably made a mistake in at least one region that has messed up things royally. Numbers start squashing up against each other quickly and you’ll be letting out a few curses when, yet again, you’ll be drawing in another pair of Xs because you simply don’t have any legal placements anywhere. Sure, there’s probably a perfect game out there in probability-land, but with the numbers being provided by those damned dice, perfection simply isn’t going to happen. This is a game, not a jigsaw puzzle, and a truly challenging game at that. While you may be feeling pretty confident in early rounds that everything is going fine, just you wait until the end when all you see is a parade of Xs dotted about your map. Oh, did we not mention that every empty space is filled up with an X at the end of the game? Thought you were cocky holding off on marking those spaces weren’t you? Yeah – here’s what happens:
Now, I know that the usual complaints will begin – because the game revolves around dice, the whole thing is too chaotic for players to have any control over. Really, I’ve found it better to consider the chaos as an intrinsic part of playing Rolling Japan; the main meat of the game is reacting to what’s been rolled and just desperately trying to not screw up too badly. If I had any gripes, there’d be my usual one that the included pad of maps will run out pretty quickly especially if you’re playing with a larger group on a regular basis. Oh, and why the hell isn’t this on my iPad? Of all the games that I’ve played recently from Essen 2014, this one feels ripe for a conversion to tablets and phones. It’s a highly entertaining way to kill fifteen minutes, either with friends or by yourself, and I can only think that Rolling Japan‘s popularity would increase if transferred to a digital platform. Plus, with future maps planned to appear in the near future – there was talk of Rolling America amongst others – you’ve got instant and easy to introduce DLC expansions! OKAZU Brand take note! Oh, and print more copies ASAP.
Rolling Japan was designed by Hisashi Hayashi and released at Essen 2014 through Japon Brand / OKAZU Brand. Between one and eight can play though, as mentioned, it’s essentially a single player affair. Copies are somewhat hard to find (as with most Japon Brand releases) but some have popped up on BGG and eBay. Here’s hoping for a wider release from another company in 2015!