Tag Archives: Espionage

Game Design Diary – Part Three: Back to Square One

It’s been a little while since I last wrote about the game that myself and Mark Rivera (from the splendid Boardgames in Blighty) are working on. While we’d not forgotten about it, it was certainly on the backburner as other stuff took precedence, most notably the UK Games Expo. The pair of us (and Chris from Unboxed!) worked like dogs as we interviewed the cream of UK designers, ran a wide range panels, talked about games and (shock) even got to play a couple. We also managed to coerce a few people to try out the prototype version of Espionage (the working title of our project) and got plenty of interesting feedback. Other folks playing your creation is always a weird thing. It’s like sending your child out into the world and worrying that everyone thinks it’s an ugly idiot.

Espionage wasn’t an ugly idiot, thankfully – but it wasn’t as good as we wanted it to be. Looking at it objectively, there’s far too much going on that’s utterly superfluous while other areas need more added. Money, which we reckoned was an important aspect of the game, turned out to be quite redundant as it was far too easy to come by and there wasn’t actually much to spend it on. On the other hand, many players thought that it didn’t feel like there were enough locations to move around on the board. This was something I tried to fix by adding spaces between the actual locations but again that didn’t feel quite right. Game design is hard.

People who tried out the game also had plenty of good things to say about it, but these issues needed dealing with – and that’s a lot of work. Now, we’ve not binned the project, but Mark and I have decided to aim for something a little more stripped down, I suppose. Looking at what we had, it feels like we’d bitten off more than we could handle. There was an awful lot of stuff going on in Espionage, but there were certainly plenty of aspects we liked. It’s time to take a step back and aim for something that we’re happy with, that works well but won’t melt players’ brains.

A couple of weeks back Mark came to me with a concept for a card game. We’re still going for the cloak and dagger theme of spycraft in the early 20th Century, but as we’re working strictly with cards instead of several million pieces we’re having to take an entirely different approach. The new idea (codenamed Ace of Spies) is a game were you’re able set your own targets. You decide what Missions you’re aiming to complete, done by collecting various necessary components. Agents, Tools, Intelligence and Locations are all needed to complete Missions of varying difficulty – and the more specific the mission, the harder it will be to collect the cards required. Easy Missions will – of course – be simple to complete but will only get you a small amount of points. The more difficult the Mission, the greater the reward – and there’s also plenty of bonuses out there too. However, if you fail to complete the mission by the end of the game, you’re penalised and points are taken away from your total. We’re looking to have a couple of different ways to approach the game as well that will hopefully provide different playing experiences.

There’s also the ability to scupper your opposition with the inclusion of Intervention cards (another element from our original idea). We’re aiming for a truly interactive experience with as much opportunity to attack others as possible. All we need to do it playtest the thing into the ground and make sure it’s as good as we hope! The next few days will see me working on basic card design (the text of which has already been written up on The World’s Biggest Spreadsheet – and I hate using Excel), spending far too much money on blank playing cards and ink cartridges, and swearing at typographical errors. Then it’s on to playtesting, honing and – inspired by the words of Tim Gunn – making it work.

Game design, hey? Like I said, it’s hard – but I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Design Diary

The Story of Espionage – Part Two: Coming Together

So here’s part two of me and Mark’s Designer Diary for our new project, Espionage. This time around, Mark takes the lead and explains exactly what our game is about… If you’ve missed Part One, click here to read it!

——————–

As you would have noticed from previous posts here and on Michael Fox’s Little Metal Dog Show, he and I are designing a board game called Espionage.

We have been putting in a lot of time and energy into the design and are now at the point where we can begin the process of play testing. Thankfully we already have volunteers to do this and I have already sent out files to them.

Its all very exciting and frightening as we open the doors to others to have a peek! Is the game perfect? Not at all. But play testing will help us to get it into (hopefully…) a condition to interest publishers. We are confident that we have a good theme – pre-World War 1 spies in London. We also are very focused and committed that Espionage will be a gateway game, suitable to all types of gamers and non-gamers with, simple, concise rules. A game to be played in roughly 30-45 minutes. Most of all, we think it will be fun!

Main premise of Espionage

Espionage is a light-hearted team based game for 2, 4 or 6 players, set in London in the period prior to the breakout of the First World War.

The players take on the roles of German Intelligence Agents or British Counter-Intelligence Agents who carry out various “Missions” to gather or prevent the gathering of military intelligence in one of the world’s most important cities. To win the game, Players gain victory points by completing missions as described by Mission cards they collect.  There are two types of victories.

Team victory – the team with the most victory points wins

Ace of Spies – The individual with the single highest total of victory points is proclaimed Ace of Spies!

Missions are completed by traveling to different locations in London using travel cards that indicate how many locations can be travelled through in a single turn.  Players can use Intervention cards to prevent other players from accomplishing their missions.  There are only 10 rounds so the players will be under pressure to complete as many missions in their hand as possible, also knowing that any uncompleted missions will count against their victory point total.

Game Process

A game of Espionage consists of 10 Rounds where all players each take their turn

Each Round has the following steps – All players

Choose the starting player

Draw Mission/Intervention cards

Draw up to three Travel cards from the Travel Card deck

Draw FIVE Shillings for Agency Travel Expenses

Individual Players in turn order do the following

Move your Hansom Cab player token and Place Start and Finish Mission Tokens as appropriate

Players can end movement on a Special Ability space to collect a Special Ability

Other players can play Intervention cards during another player’s turn

Play then passes to next player.

Last turn is at the end of 10 Rounds when the last player completes their turn actions.

End Game Phase – All Players turn over their alignment cards to reveal which alignment will be rewarded with Mission Victory Points

The winning team has the highest total of Victory Points.

The Ace of Spies is the player with the highest total of Victory Points earned.

I’ve included some images created by Michael here of our play test, in other words, very rough draft materials to give everyone a sense of the look and feel. Of course, this will change as we move along but for now, its a prototype.

Prototype London Map

Mission Card - British players complete the green missions, German players the red.

Character card - each one has a little flavour text and start location.

So far, we are generally happy with our rules as a starting point. Its been hard work and very interesting and enjoyable. We have also managed to find how best to collaborate in terms of using our strengths, skills and experiences.It has been really a rewarding exercise and who knows, we may just have something here!

——————–

Michael here again!

So, this is pretty much the sum of what we’ve been working on these past few months. Obviously both Mark and myself have full time jobs so this is something we’re plugging away with in our spare time. There’s been lots of early mornings, especially at the weekends, where I’ve dragged myself out of bed and huddled over the computer armed only with coffee and BBC Radio 5 Live attempting to get things rolling.

As you can tell from the images above, graphic design is far from my strong point. The basic look that you see is actually much better than the first shambling attempts I made – these are at least legible. However, every time I do something different on Photoshop, it’s a learning experience – slow learning admittedly, but I’m making progress nonetheless. I’m quite sure that other stuff is being forgotten as I make room for these new skills, but that’s the tradeoff I make!

Mark has been amazing. The idea originally came from him and the rules are kind of his responsibility, so blame him if they’re broken! Seriously though, he’s rewritten and rejigged them more times than you know. The original ruleset has, through our regular discussions, morphed into something that actually feels like a solid engine – but now the fun begins: playtesting. Frankly I’m bleedin’ terrified. I get worried enough about sending each episode of the show out into the ether, so having people check out something real and solid that I’ve had a hand in creating is utterly horrifying… Here’s hoping the feedback is OK. If you see a copy of Espionage around and you get to try it, please be constructive!

Leave a comment

Filed under Design Diary

The Story of Espionage – Part One

Wherein Michael reveals a desire to create but an inability to see it through. However, good fortune is just around the corner…

The cat is out of the bag – I’m co-designing a board game alongside Mark Rivera from Boardgames in Blighty. I have no idea if it’ll be any good, but I thought it’d be nice to tell the story of what’s happening. Essentially a designer’s diary, I plan on putting regular-ish updates here on the site to keep you lot appraised of what’s happening. We’re actually a fair way into the design process but didn’t want to even announce anything until we had something tangible. The game has a working title of Espionage and – at the moment – is in the ‘nearly a fully working prototype’ stage. More information will be available soon, we promise! In the meantime, here’s part one of the diary.

The old cliche is that everyone has at least one book in them. Look into the world of board games and that changes slightly as everyone and their dog reckons they’re capable of creating something that they’re sure other people would enjoy playing. Of course, who am I to buck the trend? I’ve been playing games since I was a child and reckon I’ve got a decent enough handle on them. The only issue – a complete lack of experience, ideas and resources. Never stopped me before, mind.

Flash back to October 2010 and the BoardGameCamp event that took place in London. Prior to the day, organisers announced that there was to be a special strand – a design competition, the winners of which would have their game published. This was far from your normal print run though – the victorious game would actually be put on the back of the Christmas 2011 Selection Box released by Cadburys. For those of you outside the UK, the selection box is a long running tradition, a bunch of chocolate bars and sweets put in an oversized tray, boxed up and given to people as a filler gift. I recall playing simple roll and move games that were printed on them when I was young – far from the things I love to play now, admittedly, but they were a diversion and kept me and my brother entertained.

The question that hit me was would it be possible to cross the two parts of my life? Could a game be made that appealed to the market that selection boxes are aimed at? In other words, could I put together a game for kids that was a bit more that the usual throw-a-dice, move-a-piece you’d normally get on the back of the box? Well, no. I’m not that good working on my own, but if I had a group to work with… maybe we could do something.

After putting a shout out on twitter, a group was formed. Neil from Thru the Portal, Mark from Boardgames in Blighty, my friend Chris and myself would form a team to create something. We had no idea what would come from this meeting of minds, but there was little harm in finding out. After all, what did we have to lose? Come the day of BoardGameCamp, we were run through the rules along with everyone else. I all honesty, there were a lot more teams there than I expected. Perhaps the lure of the potential glory was more than I thought…

Ideas were bounced around, and after not very long we had a basic idea for a game – up to four elves would run around a board grabbing presents for Father Christmas to deliver. These were represented by tiles that would be randomized and placed face down on the board. Most were a single present, some were double (woooo!) and some were nasty surprises, allowing you to steal from another player – after all, what’s a game without a little nastiness? A couple of playtest games later and we were happy – we had achieved a decent enough ruleset that worked, a game that was easy to understand and set up, and a playtime that wasn’t too long but still felt substantial.

The only problem though? It didn’t look too great. None of us considered that it needed to look amazing to catch the judges eyes – after all, that was what an art department would do if we were lucky enough to win. We hoped that the quality would shine through and – strangely enough – it seemed to capture the attention of the playtesters. Come judging time, we knew we’d be happy enough if we even got a mention, but as the games were picked off one by one… well, we were getting more than hopeful. It was down to the last two and – our game was announced. Our little design team had come second. Not bad at all considering that none of us had ever tried such an endeavour previously.

Cadbury, bless ’em, sent us all massive hampers of chocolate a few weeks later to say thanks.  Our game is officially theirs so we can’t say much more about it – secretly we’re all hoping they realise that it’s actually a work of genius and they’ll use it anyway – but the thought was always in the back of my mind. Is it a one off or could I make something that could potentially be published. Again, I dismissed the thought. I don’t work well on my own. Then, however, an email arrived.

“It’s Mark. I’ve had an idea for a game, but I think I need your help…”

3 Comments

Filed under Design Diary